Think instead about how you want to use the camera, and for what. I would ignore all of your reservations about the sensors, dynamic range, etc because all of those technical details will be of little difference in reality. But you'd have to be comfortable with rolling the dice on potential sensor-dust issues. I'd go with GR3x because of a)-preference for the focal length and b) available accessory vf. Next choice would be Ricoh based on size and amazing IQ. Of your choices, I'd go with your Wild Card, the Sony A7C, with one of the better-rated available small primes. You can find them as new at the big used dealers. X-T200 has a more smartphone-esque interface-no DPAD and more touchscreen-dependent. (NOT a good choice for moving subjects or video.) EVF isn't gonna set the world on fire, but it has one. Gorgeous IQ, hidden gems for stills of stationary subjects. If you're not wild about the Fuji X-Trans sensor, get one of the 2 Bayer-sensor Fuji APSC cameras with an EVF, and slap on the small prime of your choice. Eventually it seems like a choice between a few evils. Nothing to update to and I don't need another lens yes I do lean towards the fuji but the sensor is not really one of my choice I did have a XE2 for a while. If i were you i'll update get a lens or update lens.įrom your choices I'll get X100v. Why not get a tiny but very capable Sony RX100 VI/VII with its 24-200 zoom? For low lights or more artistic photos you will use your mft and when you need more flexibility you will have the small but great RX100 VI. Since you are not interested in buying into zooms due to their size and you already have good prime lenses (PL 15mm and 20mm I guess), I have a more radical idea. I will try to post the thread on the other forums that are relevant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |